Lone worker devices come in two primary types: monitored and self-monitored. The right choice depends on a company’s resources, risk levels, and operational needs. Understanding the differences helps organisations select the most effective protection.
How Do Monitored Lone Worker Devices Work?
Monitored devices send alerts to a 24/7 response centre. When an emergency occurs, trained agents assess the situation and coordinate assistance immediately. This ensures constant protection even when supervisors are unavailable.
These systems are ideal for companies with high-risk environments. They reduce response times because professionals handle incidents instantly. This level of support creates a dependable safety net for workers.
Summary: Monitored devices offer round-the-clock professional response for higher-risk operations.
How Do Self-Monitored Lone Worker Devices Operate?
Self-monitored systems send alerts directly to internal supervisors or managers. These devices rely on the company’s own team to handle emergencies and respond to missed check-ins. They work best when an organisation has available staff to oversee alerts.
Self-monitoring is often more cost-effective for smaller teams. It provides the same technological features but relies on internal management instead of external services. Companies with strong communication structures benefit most from this option.
Summary: Self-monitored devices are affordable and effective but depend on internal response capacity.
Which Approach Is Better for Different Types of Businesses?
High-risk industries usually rely on monitored devices due to the need for professional emergency response. Companies with lower-risk tasks or small teams may prefer self-monitoring because it offers flexibility at a lower cost. The decision should reflect workload, staffing levels, and overall safety requirements.
Devices like the Lone Worker Guardian can be customised to fit either approach. This gives businesses the freedom to scale safety systems as they grow. Choosing the right structure ensures consistent protection without unnecessary expense.
Summary: The best option depends on risk level, available staff, and organisational priorities.
Conclusion
Understanding the difference between monitored and self-monitored devices helps businesses choose the right level of protection. With the right safety approach, companies can protect workers effectively while supporting operational needs.
Strengthen your workforce safety with the Lone Worker Guardian.
FAQ
Q: What is a monitored lone worker device?
A: A device connected to a 24/7 professional response centre.
Q: What is a self-monitored device?
A: A device that sends alerts directly to internal supervisors or managers.
Q: Which is better for small businesses?
A: Self-monitoring is often more cost-effective, depending on risk levels.
Q: Can one device support both options?
A: Yes, many modern systems allow businesses to choose or switch between approaches.
